Curated outbound links with short blurbs. We do not republish full articles. Many pieces are advocacy-toned; treat them as one side of a contested debate. BIP status is Complete; activation is separate.
Catalog adapted from bip110.org/articles for navigation — follow each author’s original URL.
Part one on people, institutions, and incentives argued to shape Core’s informal power structure before the OP_RETURN controversy.
Part two on funding, review influence, and how inconvenient contributors can be sidelined without formal governance.
Part three tracing documentation changes, filter patches, and OP_RETURN uncap PRs toward Core’s contested 2025 merge.
Weighs the stated technical case for removing the 80-byte OP_RETURN limit against process concerns and BIP-110’s response.
Game-theory analysis and code-audit framing of what the mechanism design reveals versus what the code does.
Advocacy piece arguing why a temporary soft fork matters and addressing common FUD claims.
Argues arbitrary on-chain data creates legal exposure for node operators and frames BIP-110 as a protocol-level shrink.
Triages objections against claimed spam volume versus hypothetical edge cases.
Guided Knots review by rule, activation, grandfathering, and expiry. See also our local map.
Follow-up correcting earlier simulation bugs and revisiting the numbers.
Discusses RDTS checks vs reusing chainstate after mixing non-enforcing and enforcing software — a late-upgrade footgun class.
Contrasts explicit OP_RETURN payloads with encodings that reuse executable opcodes.
For per-article permalinks, open the listing on bip110.org — titles above match their catalog. Bitcoin Pages stays neutral: inclusion ≠ endorsement.